Defining Access for Trails: E-Bikes vs. E-Motos
Featured

Defining Access for Trails: E-Bikes vs. E-Motos

02 | Apr | '26
Vivika Stamolis

Our team has been working hard to represent the interests of riders and ensure mountain biking continues to have a strong voice in conversations around trails, recreation, and access across the state. One of the more important pieces of legislation this session takes a significant step in managing the e-motos that are becoming more common in our neighborhoods and on trails.

Last week, Governor Bob Ferguson signed Senate Bill 6110 into law, officially forming a group that will create a definition for e-motos, rules to manage them on public streets and trails, and the penalties for unauthorized use. This new law further distinguishes e-motos from e-bikes, giving land managers clearer authority to manage higher-powered machines separate from e-bikes on trails where they are already allowed.

Why Definitions Matter

You might be wondering why separating e-bikes and e-motos is important. Many of the newer e-motos, such as Surrons and similar motorcycles, are, for all intents and purposes, electric motorcycles. They are significantly more powerful and faster than pedal-assist e-bikes and are typically throttle-controlled rather than pedal-assist.

Any two-wheeler with a motor that can output more than 750 watts, or provide assistance beyond 20 mph with a throttle (or 28 mph with pedal assist), is not considered a legal e-bike in Washington; even if it has a lower power mode.

This distinction matters because mountain bike trails are designed and managed for non-motorized users and, increasingly, Class 1 pedal-assist e-bikes, which behave much more like traditional bicycles. Trails that allow motorcycles are designed differently to account for higher speeds, power, and impacts. Matching the type of trail with the type of use helps keep trails safe, sustainable, and enjoyable for everyone.

How This Supports Future Advocacy

While this legislation does not directly expand access for e-bikes, it is an important step toward future advocacy. By clearly separating e-bikes from e-motos, land managers now have stronger tools to manage higher-powered bikes independently rather than lumping them together with Class 1 pedal-assist e-bikes.

This helps protect the current legal status of Class 1, 2, and 3 e-bikes and reduces the likelihood of broad restrictions that could unintentionally limit access for riders using appropriately classified equipment.

We continue to advocate for Class 1 e-bikes where appropriate, ensuring access decisions balance recreation opportunities, trail sustainability, and safety.

Working Together Across the Trail Community

To be clear, this isn’t about opposing motorcycles or the people who ride them. We work closely with partners across the outdoor recreation community, including the Northwest Motorcycle Association, on shared stewardship and advocacy efforts around trail access.

We are committed to protecting and preserving trails while keeping them accessible to riders of all abilities and experience levels.

Our team has been working hard to represent the interests of riders and ensure mountain biking continues to have a strong voice in conversations around trails, recreation, and access across the state. One of the more important pieces of legislation this session takes a significant step in managing the e-motos that are becoming more common in our neighborhoods and on trails.
9515